Lobbying restrictions and parental controls to be discussed Tuesday

By John Labriola - The Citrus County Commission will meet on Tuesday, April 22, to discuss a pair of proposed ordinances by County Commissioner Diana Finegan to forbid county commissioners, Planning and Development Commission members, and county staff from lobbying the state on behalf of a developer, and to prohibit former county commissioners from lobbying the county for six years.

The suggested legislation reflects a 2018 voter-approved state constitutional amendment that prohibits public officials from lobbying for compensation during their term in office and for six years after they leave office.

Finegan’s proposal comes a few weeks after a controversy arose involving former County Commissioner Ruthie Schlabach, who served one term on the commission before losing reelection last year. As a lobbyist for The Southern Group, Schlabach convinced Commission Chairwoman Rebecca Bays to persuade County Administrator Steve Howard to secretly sign a $3 million appropriations request to the state legislature to widen County Road 491 on behalf of the lobbying firm's client, Metro Development Group, which has a pending application to build a 5,000-unit project along 491 called Tuscany Ranch. The funding request was withdrawn by the commission this month after it came to light.

If a majority of the commission agrees with Finegan, the county attorney will be directed to draft the ordinances for a commission vote next month.

The commission meeting is at 1 p.m. Tuesday at the Citrus County Courthouse, 110 N Apopka Ave., Inverness, FL 34450

Also on Tuesday, at 9 a.m., the Citrus County Library Advisory Board (LAB) will meet to discuss parental controls on children’s reading materials. That meeting will take place in Room 166 of the Lecanto Government Building, 3600 W Sovereign Path, Lecanto, FL 34442
 
LAB member Edith Ramlow, a College of Central Florida librarian, wants to allow parents to place restrictions on their minor children's library cards to prevent them from checking out inappropriate materials. Her proposal is in response to public anger following the board’s 5-2 vote in December to allow more than 20 challenged books to remain in the library system's Young Adult section.

The LAB will also discuss board member Lenora Nelson's proposal to establish specific guidelines to determine what materials are inappropriate for the Young Adult section. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sheriff doubles down on support for Biden's FBI

Commissioner Davis demands $$$ for pro-LGBT, anti-white tourism plan

My recommendations for the Aug. 20 primary